“Because Migri says so” : Legitimation in Negative Asylum Decisions in Finland

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/325407

Citation

Bodström , E 2020 , ' “Because Migri says so” : Legitimation in Negative Asylum Decisions in Finland ' , Nordic Journal of Migration Research , vol. 10 , no. 2 , pp. 5-19 . https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.134

Title: “Because Migri says so” : Legitimation in Negative Asylum Decisions in Finland
Author: Bodström, Erna
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Faculty of Social Sciences
Date: 2020-06
Language: eng
Number of pages: 15
Belongs to series: Nordic Journal of Migration Research
ISSN: 1799-649X
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/325407
Abstract: This article argues that authorisation and moral evaluation are the dominant legitimation strategies used in asylum decisions by the Finnish Immigration Service (Migri). After the migration events of 2015, the percentage of accepted asylum claims dropped dramatically in Finland, causing concern about the legal rights of asylum seekers. Drawing on theoretical literature concerning asylum decisions, borders and language, this article is based on a systematic analysis of 77 asylum decisions. It aims to answer the following questions: What strategies of legitimation does Migri use to support their negative asylum decisions? How are these strategies used? The study reports that the reasons behind negative asylum decisions are often not openly provided. Instead, the decisions largely rely on authorisation and implicit moral evaluation; the decision is so ‘because Migri says so’. This lack of transparency has adverse consequences for the due process of asylum seekers, and these consequences can be life changing.
Subject: 5171 Political Science
asylum seekers
asylum decisions
credibility
legitimation
Finland
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
134_732_1_PB.pdf 930.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record