Physiological responses to proposals during dyadic decision-making conversations

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328433

Citation

Stevanovic , M , Tuhkanen , S , Järvensivu , M , Koskinen , E , Savander , E & Valkia , K 2021 , ' Physiological responses to proposals during dyadic decision-making conversations ' , PLoS One , vol. 16 , no. 1 , 0244929 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244929

Title: Physiological responses to proposals during dyadic decision-making conversations
Author: Stevanovic, Melisa; Tuhkanen, Samuel; Järvensivu, Milla; Koskinen, Emmi; Savander, Enikö; Valkia, Kaisa
Other contributor: University of Helsinki, Helsinki Inequality Initiative (INEQ)
University of Helsinki, Department of Digital Humanities
University of Helsinki, University of Helsinki
University of Helsinki, Facing Narcissism
University of Helsinki, Päijät-Häme Welfare Consortium
University of Helsinki, Sociology








Date: 2021
Language: eng
Number of pages: 20
Belongs to series: PLoS One
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244929
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328433
Abstract: A novel conversation-analytically informed paradigm was used to examine how joint decision-making interaction, with its various types of proposal sequences, is reflected in the physiological responses of participants. Two types of dyads–dyads with one depressed and one non-depressed participant (N = 15) and dyads with two non-depressed participants (N = 15)–engaged in a series of conversational joint decision-making tasks, during which we measured their skin conductance (SC) responses. We found that the participants’ SC response rates were higher and more synchronized during proposal sequences than elsewhere in the conversation. Furthermore, SC response rates were higher when the participant was in the role of a proposal speaker (vs. a proposal recipient), and making a proposal was associated with higher SC response rates for participants with depression (vs. participants without depression). Moreover, the SC response rates in the proposal speaker were higher when the recipient accepted (vs. not accepted) the proposal. We interpret this finding with reference to accepting responses suggesting a commitment to future action, for which the proposal speaker may feel specifically responsible for. A better understanding of the physiological underpinnings of joint decision-making interaction may help improve democratic practices in contexts where certain individuals experience challenges in this regard.
Subject: ANXIETY
DEPRESSION
EMOTION
MENTAL-HEALTH
NEGOTIATION
PERSONALITY
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
SELF
SKIN-CONDUCTANCE
SYNCHRONY
515 Psychology
6121 Languages
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Stevanovic_et_a ... responses_to_proposals.pdf 1.006Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record