General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-6), and Mental Health Index (MHI-5) : psychometric and predictive properties in a Finnish population-based sample

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/329827

Lähdeviite

Elovainio , M , Hakulinen , C , Pulkki-Råback , L , Aalto , A-M , Virtanen , M , Partonen , T & Suvisaari , J 2020 , ' General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-6), and Mental Health Index (MHI-5) : psychometric and predictive properties in a Finnish population-based sample ' , Psychiatry Research , vol. 289 , 112973 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112973

Julkaisun nimi: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-6), and Mental Health Index (MHI-5) : psychometric and predictive properties in a Finnish population-based sample
Tekijä: Elovainio, Marko; Hakulinen, Christian; Pulkki-Råback, Laura; Aalto, Anna-Mari; Virtanen, Marianna; Partonen, Timo; Suvisaari, Jaana
Tekijän organisaatio: Department of Psychology and Logopedics
Psychosocial factors and health
Helsinki Inequality Initiative (INEQ)
Faculty of Education Common Matters
HUS Psychiatry
Päiväys: 2020-07
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 8
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Psychiatry Research
ISSN: 0165-1781
DOI-tunniste: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112973
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/329827
Tiivistelmä: The short versions of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-6), and Mental Health Index (MHI-5) are all valid and reliable measures of general psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. We tested the psychometric properties of the scales, their overlap, and their ability to predict mental health service use using both regression and machine learning (ML, random forest) approaches. Data were from the population-based FinHealth-2017 Study of adults (N = 4270) with data on all of the evaluated instruments. Constructive validity, internal consistency, invariance, and optimal cut-off points in predicting mental health services were tested. Constructive validity was acceptable and all instruments measured their own distinct phenomenon. Some of the item scoring in BDI-6 was not optimal, and the sensitivity and specificity of all scales were relatively weak in predicting service use. Small gender differences emerged in optimal cut-off points. ML did not improve model predictions. GHQ-12, BDI-6, and MHI-5 may be interpreted to measure different constructs of psychological health symptoms, but are not particularly useful predictors of service use.
Avainsanat: Distress
Depression
Population
Psychometrics
Measuring
TREATMENT SEEKING
1ST ONSET
DISORDERS
VALIDATION
COUNTRIES
VALIDITY
SERVICES
ANXIETY
SCALE
DELAY
515 Psychology
Vertaisarvioitu: Kyllä
Tekijänoikeustiedot: cc_by_nc_nd
Pääsyrajoitteet: openAccess
Rinnakkaistallennettu versio: acceptedVersion


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
Main_PR_R1.pdf 423.2KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot