Stenroth , L , Sefa , S , Arokoski , J & Töyräs , J 2019 , ' DOES MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING PROVIDE SUPERIOR RELIABILITY FOR ACHILLES AND PATELLAR TENDON CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA MEASUREMENTS COMPARED WITH ULTRASOUND IMAGING? ' , Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology , vol. 45 , no. 12 , pp. 3186-3198 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.001
Title: | DOES MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING PROVIDE SUPERIOR RELIABILITY FOR ACHILLES AND PATELLAR TENDON CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA MEASUREMENTS COMPARED WITH ULTRASOUND IMAGING? |
Author: | Stenroth, Lauri; Sefa, Sandra; Arokoski, Jari; Töyräs, Juha |
Contributor organization: | Department of Surgery HUS Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Helsinki |
Date: | 2019-12 |
Language: | eng |
Number of pages: | 13 |
Belongs to series: | Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology |
ISSN: | 0301-5629 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.001 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/330138 |
Abstract: | This study investigated the reliability of Achilles and patellar tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement using ultrasound imaging (USI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fifteen healthy adults were imaged twice on two occasions, interrupted by a tendon loading protocol. Tendon CSA segmentations were conducted by an experienced and an inexperienced rater blinded to information regarding subject, session and loading status. USI provided good test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] 2,1 > 0.85, standard error of measurement [SEM] 5%-6%), while with MRI it was excellent (ICC 2,1 > 0.92, SEM 4%) for the experienced rater. This study suggests that MRI provides superior reliability for tendon CSA measurements compared with USI. However, the difference in reliability between the methods was small, and the results were inconclusive regarding objectivity and sensitivity to change when assessed based on the effect of loading. We concluded that both methods can be used for reliable CSA measurements of the Achilles and patellar tendons when using a highly standardized measurement protocol and when conducted by an experienced rater. (C) 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved. |
Subject: |
Test-retest reliability
Inter-observer reliability Intra-observer reliability Repeatability Measurement error Sensitivity Tendon morphology MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES TRANSVERSE STRAIN EXERCISE MUSCLE TENDINOPATHY HYPERTROPHY RESISTANCE THICKNESS ACCURACY 3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology |
Peer reviewed: | Yes |
Rights: | cc_by_nc_nd |
Usage restriction: | openAccess |
Self-archived version: | acceptedVersion |
Total number of downloads: Loading...
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
UMB_Stenroth_2019_1.pdf | 1.834Mb |
View/ |