Debunking Arguments Gain Little from Cognitive Science of Religion

Show full item record



Launonen , L 2021 , ' Debunking Arguments Gain Little from Cognitive Science of Religion ' , Zygon , vol. 56 , no. 2 , pp. 416-433 .

Title: Debunking Arguments Gain Little from Cognitive Science of Religion
Author: Launonen, Lari
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Doctoral Programme in Theology and Religious Studies
Date: 2021
Language: eng
Number of pages: 18
Belongs to series: Zygon
ISSN: 0591-2385
Abstract: Cognitive science of religion (CSR) has inspired a number of debunking arguments against god-belief. They aim to show that the belief-forming processes that underlie belief in god(s) are unreliable. The debate surrounding these arguments gives the impression that CSR offers new scientific evidence that threatens the rationality of religious belief. This impression, however, is partly misleading. A close look at a few widely discussed debunking arguments shows, first, that CSR theories as such are far from providing sufficient empirical evidence that the belief-forming processes behind god-belief are unreliable. Thus, appealing solely to CSR theories makes a debunking argument weak. Second, there are strong arguments that also invoke CSR, but these gain their strength primarily from more familiar claims about evolutionary epistemology and religious diversity. What CSR actually does in these arguments is providing an explanation of why people might believe in gods even if gods did not exist. But explaining is not debunking.
Subject: 614 Theology
Big Gods
cognitive science of religion
cultural evolution
evolution of religion
evolutionary debunking arguments
evolutionary epistemology
religious diversity

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Debunking_argum ... religion_LAUNONEN_2021.pdf 158.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record