The emergence of private land conservation in scientific literature: a review

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332350

Citation

Cortes Capano , G , Toivonen , T , Soutullo , A & Di Minin , E 2019 , ' The emergence of private land conservation in scientific literature: a review ' , Biological Conservation , vol. 237 , pp. 191-199 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.010

Title: The emergence of private land conservation in scientific literature: a review
Author: Cortes Capano, Gonzalo; Toivonen, Tuuli; Soutullo, Alvaro; Di Minin, Enrico
Contributor organization: Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science
Department of Geosciences and Geography
Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
Helsinki Institute of Urban and Regional Studies (Urbaria)
Division of Urban Geography and Regional Studies
Date: 2019-09
Language: eng
Number of pages: 9
Belongs to series: Biological Conservation
ISSN: 0006-3207
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.010
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332350
Abstract: Private land conservation (PLC) is an important means for achieving global conservation targets. We reviewed peer-reviewed literature focussing on PLC to summarize past scientific evidence and to identify research trends and gaps to direct future research. We carried out an in-depth review of 284 scientific articles and analysed where, when and in what context PLC has been studied. Specifically, we (i) assessed where and when PLC studies took place and which topics they covered; (ii) identified the most addressed conservation actions and policy instruments, and (iii) investigated whether stakeholders' engagement during research processes was reported or not. We found that (i) there has been an increase in the number of scientific PLC publications over time; (ii) 78%of the articles in scientific journals focussed on four countries only (United States of America, Australia, South Africa and Canada); (iii) literature content focussed mostly on easements, programs and landowners and showed both geographical and temporal differences; (iv) land/water protection, law and policy and livelihood, economic and other incentives were the most addressed conservation actions; (v) property rights, particularly conservation easements, were the most addressed policy instrument; and (vi) half of the articles did not report the engagement of any stakeholder sector and cross-sector stakeholders' engagement was often missing. Overall, our results highlight the need for future studies on PLC to cover currently underrepresented regions; to assess the effec-tiveness of more conservation actions and policy instruments; and to test how engaging different stakeholders can potentially promote legitimate and equitable PLC policies across contexts.
Subject: BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Biodiversity
COVENANTS
Conservation actions
Conservation easements
EASEMENTS
FRAMEWORK
KNOWLEDGE
OPPORTUNITY
POLICY
PROTECTED AREAS
Policy instruments
Private land conservation
SUSTAINABILITY
Stakeholders
VOLUNTARY CONSERVATION
1172 Environmental sciences
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by_nc_nd
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: acceptedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Cortes_Capano_e ... ic_literature_a_review.pdf 627.9Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record