Cortes Capano , G , Toivonen , T , Soutullo , A & Di Minin , E 2019 , ' The emergence of private land conservation in scientific literature: a review ' , Biological Conservation , vol. 237 , pp. 191-199 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.010
Title: | The emergence of private land conservation in scientific literature: a review |
Author: | Cortes Capano, Gonzalo; Toivonen, Tuuli; Soutullo, Alvaro; Di Minin, Enrico |
Contributor organization: | Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Department of Geosciences and Geography Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS) Helsinki Institute of Urban and Regional Studies (Urbaria) Division of Urban Geography and Regional Studies |
Date: | 2019-09 |
Language: | eng |
Number of pages: | 9 |
Belongs to series: | Biological Conservation |
ISSN: | 0006-3207 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.010 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332350 |
Abstract: | Private land conservation (PLC) is an important means for achieving global conservation targets. We reviewed peer-reviewed literature focussing on PLC to summarize past scientific evidence and to identify research trends and gaps to direct future research. We carried out an in-depth review of 284 scientific articles and analysed where, when and in what context PLC has been studied. Specifically, we (i) assessed where and when PLC studies took place and which topics they covered; (ii) identified the most addressed conservation actions and policy instruments, and (iii) investigated whether stakeholders' engagement during research processes was reported or not. We found that (i) there has been an increase in the number of scientific PLC publications over time; (ii) 78%of the articles in scientific journals focussed on four countries only (United States of America, Australia, South Africa and Canada); (iii) literature content focussed mostly on easements, programs and landowners and showed both geographical and temporal differences; (iv) land/water protection, law and policy and livelihood, economic and other incentives were the most addressed conservation actions; (v) property rights, particularly conservation easements, were the most addressed policy instrument; and (vi) half of the articles did not report the engagement of any stakeholder sector and cross-sector stakeholders' engagement was often missing. Overall, our results highlight the need for future studies on PLC to cover currently underrepresented regions; to assess the effec-tiveness of more conservation actions and policy instruments; and to test how engaging different stakeholders can potentially promote legitimate and equitable PLC policies across contexts. |
Subject: |
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Biodiversity COVENANTS Conservation actions Conservation easements EASEMENTS FRAMEWORK KNOWLEDGE OPPORTUNITY POLICY PROTECTED AREAS Policy instruments Private land conservation SUSTAINABILITY Stakeholders VOLUNTARY CONSERVATION 1172 Environmental sciences |
Peer reviewed: | Yes |
Rights: | cc_by_nc_nd |
Usage restriction: | openAccess |
Self-archived version: | acceptedVersion |
Total number of downloads: Loading...
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
Cortes_Capano_e ... ic_literature_a_review.pdf | 627.9Kb |
View/ |