Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/333245

Lähdeviite

Tedersoo , L , Kungas , R , Oras , E , Köster , K , Eenmaa , H , Leijen , A , Pedaste , M , Raju , M , Astapova , A , Lukner , H , Kogermann , K & Sepp , T 2021 , ' Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines ' , Scientific data , vol. 8 , 192 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0

Julkaisun nimi: Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines
Tekijä: Tedersoo, Leho; Kungas, Rainer; Oras, Ester; Köster, Kajar; Eenmaa, Helen; Leijen, Ali; Pedaste, Margus; Raju, Marju; Astapova, Anastasiya; Lukner, Heli; Kogermann, Karin; Sepp, Tuul
Tekijän organisaatio: Department of Forest Sciences
Viikki Plant Science Centre (ViPS)
Forest Soil Science and Biogeochemistry
Ecosystem processes (INAR Forest Sciences)
Päiväys: 2021-07-27
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 11
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
DOI-tunniste: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/333245
Tiivistelmä: Data sharing is one of the cornerstones of modern science that enables large-scale analyses and reproducibility. We evaluated data availability in research articles across nine disciplines in Nature and Science magazines and recorded corresponding authors' concerns, requests and reasons for declining data sharing. Although data sharing has improved in the last decade and particularly in recent years, data availability and willingness to share data still differ greatly among disciplines. We observed that statements of data availability upon (reasonable) request are inefficient and should not be allowed by journals. To improve data sharing at the time of manuscript acceptance, researchers should be better motivated to release their data with real benefits such as recognition, or bonus points in grant and job applications. We recommend that data management costs should be covered by funding agencies; publicly available research data ought to be included in the evaluation of applications; and surveillance of data sharing should be enforced by both academic publishers and funders. These cross-discipline survey data are available from the plutoF repository.
Avainsanat: REPRODUCIBILITY
CHALLENGES
QUALITY
SCIENCE
113 Computer and information sciences
Vertaisarvioitu: Kyllä
Tekijänoikeustiedot: cc_by
Pääsyrajoitteet: openAccess
Rinnakkaistallennettu versio: publishedVersion


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
s41597_021_00981_0.pdf 1.134MB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot