Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Haubrock, Phillip J.
dc.contributor.author Turbelin, Anna J.
dc.contributor.author Cuthbert, Ross N.
dc.contributor.author Novoa, Ana
dc.contributor.author Taylor, Nigel G.
dc.contributor.author Angulo, Elena
dc.contributor.author Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana
dc.contributor.author Bodey, Thomas W.
dc.contributor.author Capinha, Cesar
dc.contributor.author Diagne, Christophe
dc.contributor.author Essl, Franz
dc.contributor.author Golivets, Marina
dc.contributor.author Kirichenko, Natalia
dc.contributor.author Kourantidou, Melina
dc.contributor.author Leroy, Boris
dc.contributor.author Renault, David
dc.contributor.author Verbrugge, Laura
dc.contributor.author Courchamp, Franck
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-19T13:05:01Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-19T13:05:01Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07-29
dc.identifier.citation Haubrock , P J , Turbelin , A J , Cuthbert , R N , Novoa , A , Taylor , N G , Angulo , E , Ballesteros-Mejia , L , Bodey , T W , Capinha , C , Diagne , C , Essl , F , Golivets , M , Kirichenko , N , Kourantidou , M , Leroy , B , Renault , D , Verbrugge , L & Courchamp , F 2021 , ' Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe ' , NeoBiota , vol. 67 , pp. 153-190 . https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.58196
dc.identifier.other PURE: 167719356
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: d3b75a8b-498e-47ac-b3fa-0b4bad2e492d
dc.identifier.other WOS: 000681070700007
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0003-2888-9027/work/98709382
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/333320
dc.description.abstract Biological invasions continue to threaten the stability of ecosystems and societies that are dependent on their services. Whilst the ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) have been widely reported in recent decades, there remains a paucity of information concerning their economic impacts. Europe has strong trade and transport links with the rest of the world, facilitating hundreds of IAS incursions, and largely centralised decision-making frameworks. The present study is the first comprehensive and detailed effort that quantifies the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examines temporal trends in these data. In addition, the distributions of costs across countries, socioeconomic sectors and taxonomic groups are examined, as are socio-economic correlates of management and damage costs. Total costs of IAS in Europe summed to US$140.20 billion (or euro116.61 billion) between 1960 and 2020, with the majority (60%) being damage-related and impacting multiple sectors. Costs were also geographically widespread but dominated by impacts in large western and central European countries, i.e. the UK, Spain, France, and Germany. Human population size, land area, GDP, and tourism were significant predictors of invasion costs, with management costs additionally predicted by numbers of introduced species, research effort and trade. Temporally, invasion costs have increased exponentially through time, with up to US$23.58 billion (euro19.64 billion) in 2013, and US$139.56 billion (euro116.24 billion) in impacts extrapolated in 2020. Importantly, although these costs are substantial, there remain knowledge gaps on several geographic and taxonomic scales, indicating that these costs are severely underestimated. We, thus, urge increased and improved cost reporting for economic impacts of IAS and coordinated international action to prevent further spread and mitigate impacts of IAS populations. en
dc.format.extent 38
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof NeoBiota
dc.rights cc_by
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Bodiversity
dc.subject European Union
dc.subject InvaCost
dc.subject monetary impacts
dc.subject non-native biota
dc.subject socio-economic correlates
dc.subject socioeconomic sectors
dc.subject 511 Economics
dc.title Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe en
dc.type Article
dc.contributor.organization Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
dc.contributor.organization Department of Forest Sciences
dc.description.reviewstatus Peer reviewed
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.58196
dc.relation.issn 1619-0033
dc.rights.accesslevel openAccess
dc.type.version publishedVersion

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
NB_article_58196_en_1.pdf 2.295Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record