Does working beyond the statutory retirement age have an impact on health and functional capacity? The Finnish Retirement and Aging cohort study

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/333943

Citation

KC , P , Virtanen , M , Pentti , J , Kivimäki , M , Vahtera , J & Stenholm , S 2021 , ' Does working beyond the statutory retirement age have an impact on health and functional capacity? The Finnish Retirement and Aging cohort study ' , Occupational and Environmental Medicine , vol. 78 , no. 7 , pp. 509-515 . https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106964

Title: Does working beyond the statutory retirement age have an impact on health and functional capacity? The Finnish Retirement and Aging cohort study
Author: KC, Prakash; Virtanen, Marianna; Pentti, Jaana; Kivimäki, Mika; Vahtera, Jussi; Stenholm, Sari
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Clinicum
University of Helsinki, Clinicum
Date: 2021-07
Language: eng
Number of pages: 7
Belongs to series: Occupational and Environmental Medicine
ISSN: 1351-0711
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/333943
Abstract: Objective This study aimed to compare the development of self-rated health, psychological distress and physical functioning between those retired on time and those who continued working beyond the individual retirement age. Methods The study population consisted of 2340 public sector employees from the Finnish Retirement and Aging study. Participants were categorised into no extension of employment (retired at the individual retirement date or = 12 months). Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was used to identify comparable group of participants in the no-extension (n=574) and extension (n=574) groups by taking into account preretirement characteristics and their interactions. Results The prevalence of suboptimal self-rated health and psychological distress changed a little among the extension group during the follow-up from 1 year before (T1) to 18 months (T2) and 30 months (T3) after individual pensionable date. Compared with no extension, the risk of having suboptimal self-rated health in the extension group was 0.89 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.17) at T1, 1.16 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.53) at T2 and 0.96 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.37) at T3. For psychological distress, the corresponding risk ratios were 0.93 (0.65 to 1.32), 1.15 (0.78 to 1.69) and 1.04 (0.61 to 1.79). The mean differences in the number of physical functioning difficulties between the extension and no-extension groups were 0.06 (-0.16 to 0.29) at T1, 0.05 (-0.18 to 0.27) at T2 and -0.11 (-0.39 to 0.17) at T3. Conclusions This study found no evidence that voluntarily extending the working career beyond retirement age would pose a risk to health and physical functioning among ageing workers.
Subject: epidemiology
public health
ageing
longitudinal studies
retired
PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS
LIFE
3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational health
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
KC_Prakash_retirement_age.pdf 905.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record