dc.contributor.author |
Pirneskoski, Jussi |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tamminen, Joonas |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kallonen, Antti |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Nurmi, Jouni |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kuisma, Markku |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Olkkola, Klaus T. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hoppu, Sanna |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-09-22T09:54:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-09-22T09:54:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-12 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Pirneskoski , J , Tamminen , J , Kallonen , A , Nurmi , J , Kuisma , M , Olkkola , K T & Hoppu , S 2020 , ' Random forest machine learning method outperforms prehospital National Early Warning Score for predicting one-day mortality : A retrospective study ' , Resuscitation plus , vol. 4 , 100046 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100046 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
PURE: 168668567 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
PURE UUID: d16829d2-367c-42ae-b4ee-8a51f642fc46 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
WOS: 000675511000019 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
ORCID: /0000-0002-3057-6524/work/100389953 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
ORCID: /0000-0001-7872-8665/work/100390530 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/334541 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Aim of the study: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is a validated method for predicting clinical deterioration in hospital wards, but its performance in prehospital settings remains controversial. Modern machine learning models may outperform traditional statistical analyses for predicting short-term mortality. Thus, we aimed to compare the mortality prediction accuracy of NEWS and random forest machine learning using prehospital vital signs. Methods: In this retrospective study, all electronic ambulance mission reports between 2008 and 2015 in a single EMS system were collected. Adult patients (>= 18 years) were included in the analysis. Random forest models with and without blood glucose were compared to the traditional NEWS for predicting one-day mortality. A ten-fold cross-validation method was applied to train and validate the random forest models. Results: A total of 26,458 patients were included in the study of whom 278 (1.0%) died within one day of ambulance mission. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for one-day mortality was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.810-0.860) for NEWS, 0.858 (95% CI, 0.832-0.883) for a random forest trained with NEWS variables only and 0.868 (0.843-0.892) for a random forest trained with NEWS variables and blood glucose. Conclusion: A random forest algorithm trained with NEWS variables was superior to traditional NEWS for predicting one-day mortality in adult prehospital patients, although the risk of selection bias must be acknowledged. The inclusion of blood glucose in the model further improved its predictive performance. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
7 |
|
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Resuscitation plus |
|
dc.rights |
cc_by |
|
dc.rights.uri |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
|
dc.subject |
Emergency medical services |
|
dc.subject |
Prehospital |
|
dc.subject |
Cardiac arrest prevention |
|
dc.subject |
Early warning score |
|
dc.subject |
National Early Warning Score |
|
dc.subject |
NEWS |
|
dc.subject |
Random forest |
|
dc.subject |
Machine learning |
|
dc.subject |
IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY |
|
dc.subject |
CARE-UNIT ADMISSION |
|
dc.subject |
RISK |
|
dc.subject |
3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology |
|
dc.title |
Random forest machine learning method outperforms prehospital National Early Warning Score for predicting one-day mortality : A retrospective study |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
Helsinki University Hospital Area |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
HUS Emergency Medicine and Services |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
Staff Services |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
HUS Perioperative, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
Department of Diagnostics and Therapeutics |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
Clinicum |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
Anestesiologian yksikkö |
|
dc.description.reviewstatus |
Peer reviewed |
|
dc.relation.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100046 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
2666-5204 |
|
dc.rights.accesslevel |
openAccess |
|
dc.type.version |
publishedVersion |
|