Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/336372

Citation

Kikuchi , D W , Herberstein , M E , Barfield , M , Holt , R D & Mappes , J 2021 , ' Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities ' , Biological Reviews , vol. 96 , no. 6 , pp. 2446-2460 . https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12760

Title: Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities
Author: Kikuchi, David W.; Herberstein, Marie E.; Barfield, Michael; Holt, Robert D.; Mappes, Johanna
Contributor organization: Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme
Date: 2021-12
Language: eng
Number of pages: 15
Belongs to series: Biological Reviews
ISSN: 1464-7931
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12760
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/336372
Abstract: Warning signals are a striking example of natural selection present in almost every ecological community - from Nordic meadows to tropical rainforests, defended prey species and their mimics ward off potential predators before they attack. Yet despite the wide distribution of warning signals, they are relatively scarce as a proportion of the total prey available, and more so in some biomes than others. Classically, warning signals are thought to be governed by positive density-dependent selection, i.e. they succeed better when they are more common. Therefore, after surmounting this initial barrier to their evolution, it is puzzling that they remain uncommon on the scale of the community. Here, we explore factors likely to determine the prevalence of warning signals in prey assemblages. These factors include the nature of prey defences and any constraints upon them, the behavioural interactions of predators with different prey defences, the numerical responses of predators governed by movement and reproduction, the diversity and abundance of undefended alternative prey and Batesian mimics in the community, and variability in other ecological circumstances. We also discuss the macroevolution of warning signals. Our review finds that we have a basic understanding of how many species in some taxonomic groups have warning signals, but very little information on the interrelationships among population abundances across prey communities, the diversity of signal phenotypes, and prey defences. We also have detailed knowledge of how a few generalist predator species forage in artificial laboratory environments, but we know much less about how predators forage in complex natural communities with variable prey defences. We describe how empirical work to address each of these knowledge gaps can test specific hypotheses for why warning signals exhibit their particular patterns of distribution. This will help us to understand how behavioural interactions shape ecological communities.
Subject: community ecology
predator-prey interactions
ecological niche
Batesian mimicry
Mullerian mimicry
aposematism
FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION
CORAL-SNAKE PATTERN
BATESIAN MIMICRY
MULLERIAN MIMICRY
SHIFTING BALANCE
CHEMICAL DEFENSE
COLOR PATTERN
ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSES
RISK-TAKING
BODY-SIZE
1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by_nc_nd
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
aposematism.pdf 1.737Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record