Concreteness fading in learning secondary school physics concepts

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/337664

Citation

Kokkonen , T , Lichtenberger , A & Schalk , L 2022 , ' Concreteness fading in learning secondary school physics concepts ' , Learning and Instruction , vol. 77 , 101524 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101524

Title: Concreteness fading in learning secondary school physics concepts
Author: Kokkonen, Tommi; Lichtenberger, Andreas; Schalk, Lennart
Contributor organization: Department of Physics
Maker@STEAM
Date: 2022-02
Language: eng
Number of pages: 11
Belongs to series: Learning and Instruction
ISSN: 0959-4752
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101524
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/337664
Abstract: Concreteness fading has been proposed as a general instructional approach to support learning of abstract mathematics and science concepts. Accordingly, organizing external knowledge representations in a three-step concrete-to-idealized sequence should be more beneficial than the reverse, concreteness introduction, sequence. So far, evidence for the benefits of concreteness fading come mainly from studies investigating learning of basic mathematics concepts. Studies on learning natural science concepts are scarce and have not implemented the full three-step-sequence. In an experimental classroom study (N = 70), we compared concreteness fading and concreteness introduction in high school science education about electromagnetic induction using a detailed assessment. Furthermore, we explored whether these sequences differentially affect the use of the different representations during instruction. Both sequences were equally effective and there were no differences in using the representations. We discuss why our results question the proposed advantages of concreteness fading and highlight conceptual differences and learning goals across domains.
Subject: Concreteness fading
Physics education
Science education
Multiple representations
Upper secondary school
Conceptual understanding
KNOWLEDGE
FRAMEWORK
INSTRUCTION
MATHEMATICS
ADVANTAGE
EXAMPLES
SUPPORT
SYMBOLS
114 Physical sciences
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S0959475221000839_main.pdf 2.182Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record