Development of otology specific outcome measure : Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/338638

Citation

Laakso , J T , Silvola , J , Hirvonen , T , Suutarla , S , Kivekäs , I , Saarinen , R , Haavisto , L , Laitakari , J , Aarnisalo , A A , Dietz , A , Jero , J , Hytönen , M & Sinkkonen , S T 2021 , ' Development of otology specific outcome measure : Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16) ' , Journal of Otology , vol. 16 , no. 3 , pp. 150-157 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003

Title: Development of otology specific outcome measure : Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)
Author: Laakso, Juha T.; Silvola, Juha; Hirvonen, Timo; Suutarla, Samuli; Kivekäs, Ilkka; Saarinen, Riitta; Haavisto, Lotta; Laitakari, Jaakko; Aarnisalo, Antti A.; Dietz, Aarno; Jero, Jussi; Hytönen, Maija; Sinkkonen, Saku T.
Contributor organization: Korva-, nenä- ja kurkkutautien klinikka
HUS Head and Neck Center
University of Helsinki
Clinicum
Kymsote – Social and Health Services in Kymenlaakso
HYKS erva
Date: 2021-07
Language: eng
Number of pages: 8
Belongs to series: Journal of Otology
ISSN: 1672-2930
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/338638
Abstract: Purpose: An important outcome measure of patient care is the impact on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current ear-specific HRQoL instruments are designed for one diagnosis and emphasize different subdivisions such as symptoms, hearing problems, psychosocial impact, and the need for care. The optimal length of the recall period has not been studied. For these reasons, a new survey is needed that would cover most chronic ear diseases. Methods: A preliminary 24-item survey (EOS-24) was created. Untreated adult patients (included n = 186) with one of seven different chronic otologic conditions from all university hospitals in Finland were recruited to respond to EOS-24 and the 15D general HRQoL instrument. The recruiting otologists evaluated the severity of the disease and the disability caused by it. A control group was recruited. Based on the patients' responses in different diagnosis groups, the items were reduced according to pre-defined criteria. The resulting survey was validated using a thorough statistical analysis. Results: The relevance and necessity of the original 24 items were thoroughly investigated, leading to the exclusion of 8 items and the modification of 1. The remaining 16 items were well-balanced between subdivisions and were useful in all seven diagnosis groups, thus constituting the final instrument, EOS-16. The most suitable recall period was three months. Conclusions: EOS-16 has been created according to the HRQoL survey guidelines with a versatile nationwide patient population. The survey has been validated and can be used for a wide range of chronic ear diseases as a HRQoL instrument. (C) 2021 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
Subject: Otology
Chronic ear diseases
HRQoL
Health-related quality of life
PROM
QUALITY-OF-LIFE
OTITIS-MEDIA
HEALTH-STATUS
VALIDATION
QUESTIONNAIRE
PRINCIPLES
3125 Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by_nc_nd
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S1672293021000039_main.pdf 1.469Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record