Exposure-adjusted racial/ethnic disparities in mortality in the U.S.

Show full item record




Arolas , H P I , Acosta , E , Dudel , C , Hale , J M & Myrskylä , M 2021 ' Exposure-adjusted racial/ethnic disparities in mortality in the U.S. ' MPIDR Working Paper , no. WP-2021-023 , Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research , Rostock . https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2021-023

Title: Exposure-adjusted racial/ethnic disparities in mortality in the U.S.
Author: Arolas, Héctor Pifarré i; Acosta, Enrique; Dudel, Christian; Hale, Jo Mhairi; Myrskylä, Mikko
Contributor organization: Doctoral Programme in Social Sciences
Population Research Unit (PRU)
Faculty Common Matters
Centre for Social Data Science, CSDS
Center for Population, Health and Society
Publisher: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
Date: 2021
Language: eng
Number of pages: 15
Belongs to series: MPIDR Working Paper
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2021-023
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/340364
Abstract: Background: Racial mortality disparities in the U.S. are well-documented and central to the debate on social inequalities in health. We argue that standard measures that are used to describe the disparities, such as life expectancy or years of life lost, underestimate those disparities. Methods: We analyze contemporary U.S. mortality disparities comparing Blacks and Hispanics to Whites using CDC and NCHS data. We estimate mortality disparities using standard metrics and a novel approach that weights mortality inequalities by the population fraction that is exposed to the inequalities. We then express the magnitude of these inequalities by comparing them to the loss of life due to leading causes of death. Results: Based on the exposure-adjusted measure, the Black mortality disadvantage is as deadly or deadlier than circulatory diseases, the top cause of death in the U.S; and 43% (men) and 87% (women) larger than the disadvantage as measured by life expectancy. For Hispanics, the exposure-adjusted mortality advantage over Whites is over two times larger, for both men and women, than what life expectancy disparities would imply, and 21% (men) and 11% (women) larger than when measured using standard years of life lost. Conclusions: Mortality inequalities experienced by real populations can differ markedly from the inequalities that are calculated for synthetic populations that are used in standard calculations. We show that racial/ethnic disparities in the U.S. are underestimated if not adjusted for the populations experiencing the inequalities. For health policy the exposure-adjusted inequalities are likely to provide a more reasonable signal on where to allocate scarce resources.
Subject: 5141 Sociology
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
wp_2021_023.pdf 803.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record