Efficacy of the implementation of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II decision rule to clinical practice for paediatric head injury patients

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/340430

Lähdeviite

Hautala , M , Koskela , U , Pokka , T , Rantala , H , Uhari , M , Serlo , W & Mikkonen , K 2021 , ' Efficacy of the implementation of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II decision rule to clinical practice for paediatric head injury patients ' , Acta Paediatrica , vol. 110 , no. 7 , pp. 2200-2205 . https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15859

Julkaisun nimi: Efficacy of the implementation of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II decision rule to clinical practice for paediatric head injury patients
Tekijä: Hautala, Maria; Koskela, Ulla; Pokka, Tytti; Rantala, Heikki; Uhari, Matti; Serlo, Willy; Mikkonen, Kirsi
Tekijän organisaatio: Lastenneurologian yksikkö
Children's Hospital
HUS Children and Adolescents
Helsinki University Hospital Area
University of Helsinki
Päiväys: 2021-07
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 6
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Acta Paediatrica
ISSN: 0803-5253
DOI-tunniste: https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15859
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/340430
Tiivistelmä: Aim To investigate the usefulness of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) II head trauma decision rule in clinical practice for paediatric patients in a tertiary university hospital serving as the only paediatric hospital in the area. Methods We compared how doctors evaluated and examined patients with head injury during two time periods, before and after the introduction of NEXUS II decision rule. Multiple implementation strategies were used as follows: education, tutoring and written instructions for the use of NEXUS II. Results Two hundred and forty-four head injury patients visited the hospital before and 385 after the introduction of the NEXUS II decision rule. The number of hospital admissions (56%) and the mean duration of hospitalisation (2.5 days) remained the same during the two periods. In the NEXUS II evaluated group, there was a decrease of 40% in the number of hospital admissions. NEXUS II was applied in only 62 (16%) cases. The number of head imaging procedures remained the same. No patients with a clinically significant head injury were missed with the NEXUS II evaluation. Conclusion NEXUS II was ineffective as our implementation failed. When used, NEXUS II reduced expenses in our study population by decreasing the number of hospital admissions.
Avainsanat: brain injury
clinical decision rule
head trauma
implementation
National Emergency X&#8208
Radiography Utilization Study II
3123 Gynaecology and paediatrics
Vertaisarvioitu: Kyllä
Tekijänoikeustiedot: cc_by_nc_nd
Pääsyrajoitteet: openAccess
Rinnakkaistallennettu versio: publishedVersion


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
apa.15859.pdf 654.1KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot