The intellectual marginalisation of Africa : African Identities

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/340849

Lähdeviite

Obeng-Odoom , F 2019 , ' The intellectual marginalisation of Africa : African Identities ' , African identities , vol. 17 , no. 3-4 , pp. 211-224 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2019.1667223

Julkaisun nimi: The intellectual marginalisation of Africa : African Identities
Tekijä: Obeng-Odoom, F.
Tekijän organisaatio: Global Development Studies
Helsinki Institute of Urban and Regional Studies (Urbaria)
Helsinki Inequality Initiative (INEQ)
Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
Päiväys: 2019
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 14
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: African identities
ISSN: 1472-5843
DOI-tunniste: https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2019.1667223
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/340849
Tiivistelmä: The intellectual marginalisation of Africa is often explained in terms of the lack of human capital. However, the peripheralization and systemic neglect of excellent research published in Africa problematise the human capital thesis and, ironically, demonstrate that the appeal to ‘Southern theory’ is not a panacea either. Although these perspectives are quite distinct, both seek to explain, and ultimately redress, Africa’s intellectual marginalisation apart from, not as part of, Africa’s marginalised position in the world system. The growing gulf between the use of knowledge produced in Africa and that in the metropole as well as little metropoles in the continent is patterned after global inequalities–not just differences in levels of human capital or the underappreciation of African knowledge systems. The historical and continuing concentration of the instruments of knowledge production in the hands of elites, the inferiorisation of the contribution of Africans, especially women, and the peripheralization of African outlets of production and dissemination have been central to the creation and persistence of this intellectual marginalisation. Creating structures of dependence and imitative research neither critical of, nor confrontational to, power imbalances is one outcome which, in turn, further legitimises the status quo because its resulting knowledge is unlikely to challenge the hegemony of the global north. This knowledge hierarchy reinforces the privileged status of knowledge produced in the north, while seeking to undermine the potential transformative power of southern knowledge. If so, merely seeking to develop ‘Southern theory’ is an ineffective alternative to the human capital thesis. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Avainsanat: Africa
capitalism
digital divide
Intellectual inequalities
knowledge divide
519 Social and economic geography
Vertaisarvioitu: Kyllä
Tekijänoikeustiedot: cc_by_nc
Pääsyrajoitteet: openAccess
Rinnakkaistallennettu versio: acceptedVersion


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
Manuscript_African_Identities_30.4.2019.pdf 428.7KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot