Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) : A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/340864

Citation

Tugin , S , Souza , V H , Nazarova , M A , Novikov , P A , Tervo , A E , Nieminen , J O , Lioumis , P , Ziemann , U , Nikulin , V V & Ilmoniemi , R J 2021 , ' Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) : A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study ' , PLoS One , vol. 16 , no. 9 , e0257554 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257554

Title: Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) : A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study
Author: Tugin, Sergei; Souza, Victor H.; Nazarova, Maria A.; Novikov, Pavel A.; Tervo, Aino E.; Nieminen, Jaakko O.; Lioumis, Pantelis; Ziemann, Ulf; Nikulin, Vadim V.; Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
Contributor organization: BioMag Laboratory
HUS Medical Imaging Center
Date: 2021-09-22
Language: eng
Number of pages: 16
Belongs to series: PLoS One
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257554
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/340864
Abstract: Besides stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (ISI), the electric field (E-field) orientation is known to affect both short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) in paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it has yet to be established how distinct orientations of the conditioning (CS) and test stimuli (TS) affect the SICI and SICF generation. With the use of a multi-channel TMS transducer that provides electronic control of the stimulus orientation and intensity, we aimed to investigate how changes in the CS and TS orientation affect the strength of SICI and SICF. We hypothesized that the CS orientation would play a major role for SICF than for SICI, whereas the CS intensity would be more critical for SICI than for SICF. In eight healthy subjects, we tested two ISIs (1.5 and 2.7 ms), two CS and TS orientations (anteromedial (AM) and posteromedial (PM)), and four CS intensities (50, 70, 90, and 110% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)). The TS intensity was fixed at 110% RMT. The intensities were adjusted to the corresponding RMT in the AM and PM orientations. SICI and SICF were observed in all tested CS and TS orientations. SICI depended on the CS intensity in a U-shaped manner in any combination of the CS and TS orientations. With 70% and 90% RMT CS intensities, stronger PM-oriented CS induced stronger inhibition than weaker AM-oriented CS. Similar SICF was observed for any CS orientation. Neither SICI nor SICF depended on the TS orientation. We demonstrated that SICI and SICF could be elicited by the CS perpendicular to the TS, which indicates that these stimuli affected either overlapping or strongly connected neuronal populations. We concluded that SICI is primarily sensitive to the CS intensity and that CS intensity adjustment resulted in similar SICF for different CS orientations.
Description: Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Tugin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Subject: 3112 Neurosciences
3124 Neurology and psychiatry
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
journal.pone.0257554.pdf 1.312Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record