Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework : Tensions and prospects

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/345824

Citation

Raymond , C M , Cebrián-Piqueras , M A , Andersson , E , Andrade , R , Schnell , A A , Battioni Romanelli , B , Filyushkina , A , Goodson , D J , Horcea-Milcu , A , Johnson , D N , Keller , R , Kuiper , J J , Lo , V , López-Rodríguez , M D , March , H , Metzger , M , Oteros-Rozas , E , Salcido , E , Sellberg , M , Stewart , W , Ruiz-Mallén , I , Plieninger , T , van Riper , C J , Verburg , P H & Wiedermann , M M 2022 , ' Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework : Tensions and prospects ' , One Earth , vol. 5 , no. 3 , pp. 252-264 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008

Title: Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework : Tensions and prospects
Author: Raymond, Christopher M.; Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.; Andersson, Erik; Andrade, Riley; Schnell, Alberto Arroyo; Battioni Romanelli, Barbara; Filyushkina, Anna; Goodson, Devin J.; Horcea-Milcu, Andra; Johnson, Dana N.; Keller, Rose; Kuiper, Jan J.; Lo, Veronica; López-Rodríguez, María D.; March, Hug; Metzger, Marc; Oteros-Rozas, Elisa; Salcido, Evan; Sellberg, My; Stewart, William; Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel; Plieninger, Tobias; van Riper, Carena J.; Verburg, Peter H.; Wiedermann, Magdalena M.
Contributor organization: Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
Human-Nature Transformations Research Group
Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
Department of Economics and Management
Date: 2022-03-18
Language: eng
Number of pages: 13
Belongs to series: One Earth
ISSN: 2590-3330
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/345824
Abstract: The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.
Description: Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Subject: biodiversity conservation
ecosystem services
equity
inclusive conservation
plural valuation
protected area management
values
1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S2590332222000938_main.pdf 4.212Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record