Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a meta-analysis

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/346001

Citation

Gunn , R L , Hartley , I R , Algar , A C , Niemelä , P T & Keith , S A 2022 , ' Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a meta-analysis ' , Oikos , vol. 2022 , no. 4 . https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08366

Title: Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a meta-analysis
Author: Gunn, R.L.; Hartley, I.R.; Algar, A.C.; Niemelä, Petri T.; Keith, S.A.
Contributor organization: Evolution, Conservation, and Genomics
Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme
Date: 2022-04
Language: eng
Number of pages: 13
Belongs to series: Oikos
ISSN: 0030-1299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08366
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/346001
Abstract: Behavioural responses are often the first reaction of an organism to human-induced rapid environmental change (HIREC), yet current empirical evidence provides no consensus about the main environmental features that animals respond to behaviourally or which behaviours are responsive to HIREC. To understand how changes in behaviour can be predicted by different forms of HIREC, we conducted a meta-analysis of the existing empirical literature focusing on behavioural responses to five axes of environmental change (climate change, changes in CO2, direct human impact, changes in nutrients and biotic exchanges) in five behavioural domains (aggression, exploration, activity, boldness and sociability) across a range of taxa but with a focus on fish and bird species. Our meta-analysis revealed a general absence of directional behavioural responses to HIREC. However, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes was large. This means that animals have strong behavioural responses to HIREC, but the responses are not clearly in any particular direction. Moreover, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes differed between different behaviours and different forms of HIREC: Exploration responded more strongly than activity, and climate change induced the strongest behavioural responses. Model heterogeneities identified that effect sizes varied primarily because of study design, and the specific sample of individuals used in a study; phylogeny also explains significant variation in our bird model. Based on these results, we make four recommendations to further our understanding: 1) a more balanced representation of laboratory and field studies, 2) consideration of context dependency, 3) standardisation of the methods and definitions used to quantify and study behaviours and 4) consideration of the role for individual differences in behaviour. © 2021 Nordic Society Oikos. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
Bayesian
behaviour
climate change
field
laboratory
PERSONALITY
URBAN
CLIMATE-CHANGE
TERRESTRIAL
HETEROGENEITY
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
TEMPERATURES
ECOLOGY
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
LIFE
PLASTICITY
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Oikos_2021_Gunn ... e_a_meta_u2010analysis.pdf 790.5Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record