How Issues Become (Re)constructed in the Media: Discursive Practices in the AstraZeneca Merger

Visa enkel post

dc.contributor.author Hellgren, B
dc.contributor.author Puttonen, L
dc.contributor.author Lowstedt, J
dc.contributor.author Tienari, J
dc.contributor.author Vaara, E
dc.contributor.author Werr, A
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-08T10:15:13Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-08T10:15:13Z
dc.date.issued 2012-11-08
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/37474
dc.description.abstract In this article, we put forward a novel way of exploring difference and contradiction in merging organizations. We examine how the media (re)constructs meanings in a major cross-border merger. Based on an analysis of press coverage, we attempt to specify and illustrate how particular issues are (re)constructed in media texts through interpretations of ‘winning’ and ‘losing’. We also show how specific discourses are drawn on in this (re)construction. In the merger studied, discourse based on economic and financial rationale dominated the media coverage. Discourse promoting nationalistic sentiments, however, provided an alternative discursive frame to the dominant rationalistic discourse. We argue that the two basic discourses are enacted in three analytically distinct discursive practices in the media: factualizing, rationalizing and emotionalizing. We suggest that the ability of different actors such as top managers to make use of different discursive strategies and resources in promoting their ‘versions of reality’ in the media (or public discussion) is a crucial avenue for research in this area. fi
dc.language.iso en fi
dc.publisher Hanken School of Economics fi
dc.title How Issues Become (Re)constructed in the Media: Discursive Practices in the AstraZeneca Merger fi
dc.type Article fi

Filer under denna titel

Filer Storlek Format Granska/Öppna
Hellgren, Lowst ... ari, Vaara, Werr, 2002.pdf 118.6Kb PDF Granska/Öppna
Detta dokument registreras i samling:

Visa enkel post

Sök i Helda


Avancerad Sökning

Bläddra

Aktivitet