TY  -  
T1  - A new methodology to assess the performance and uncertainty of source apportionment models II : The results of two European intercomparison exercises 
SN  -  /  
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10138/203746 
T3  -  
A1  - Belis, C. A.; Karagulian, F.; Amato, F.; Almeida, M.; Artaxo, P.; Beddows, D. C. S.; Bernardoni, V.; Bove, M. C.; Carbone, S.; Cesari, D.; Contini, D.; Cuccia, E.; Diapouli, E.; Eleftheriadis, K.; Favez, O.; El Haddad, I.; Harrison, R. M.; Hellebust, S.; Hovorka, J.; Jang, E.; Jorquera, H.; Kammermeier, T.; Karl, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Mooibroek, D.; Nava, S.; Nojgaard, J. K.; Paatero, P.; Pandolfi, M.; Perrone, M. G.; Petit, J. E.; Pietrodangelo, A.; Pokorna, P.; Prati, P.; Prevot, A. S. H.; Quass, U.; Querol, X.; Saraga, D.; Sciare, J.; Sfetsos, A.; Valli, G.; Vecchi, R.; Vestenius, M.; Yubero, E.; Hopke, P. K. 
A2  -  
PB  -  
Y1  - 2015 
LA  - eng 
AB  - The performance and the uncertainty of receptor models (RMs) were assessed in intercomparison exercises employing real-world and synthetic input datasets. To that end, the results obtained by different practitioners using ten different RMs were compared with a reference. In order to explain the differences in the performances and uncertainties of the different approaches, the apportioned mass, the number of sources, the chemical profiles, the contribution-to-species and the time trends of the so... 
VO  -  
IS  -  
SP  -  
OP  -  
KW  - Source apportionment; Receptor models; Intercomparison exercise; Model performance indicators; Model uncertainty; Particulate matter; PM SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; PARTICULATE MATTER; RECEPTOR MODELS; AIR-QUALITY; POLLUTION; AEROSOLS; AREA; 114 Physical sciences; 1172 Environmental sciences 
N1  -   
PP  -  
ER  -