TY  -  
T1  - Predefined Criteria and Interpretative Flexibility in Legal Courts’ Evaluation of Expertise 
SN  -  /  
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10138/310753 
T3  -  
A1  - Taipale, Jaakko 
A2  -  
PB  -  
Y1  - 2019 
LA  - eng 
AB  - This study examines two different approaches in empirical analysis of judges' evaluation of expertise in court: first, an analyst-based approach that employs predefined normative criteria to measure judges' performance, and second, an actor-based approach that emphasizes interpretative flexibility in judges' evaluation practice. I demonstrate how these different approaches to investigating judges' adjudication lead to differing understandings about judges' abilities to evaluate scientific eviden... 
VO  -  
IS  -  
SP  -  
OP  -  
KW  - 611 Philosophy; 5200 Other social sciences; Daubert; DTI; expertise; fMRI; interpretative flexibility; law and science; practice; scientific literacy; traumatic brain injury; SCIENCE; JUDGES; LAW; CREDIBILITY 
N1  -   
PP  -  
ER  -