A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/182240

Citation

Jurgilevich , A , Räsänen , T A , Groundstroem , F M & Juhola , S K 2017 , ' A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments ' , Environmental Research Letters , vol. 12 , no. 1 , 013002 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5508

Title: A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments
Author: Jurgilevich, Alexandra; Räsänen, Tuomas Aleksi; Groundstroem, Fanny Marie; Juhola, Sirkku Kaarina
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Environmental Sciences
University of Helsinki, Environmental Sciences
University of Helsinki, Environmental Sciences
University of Helsinki, Environmental Sciences
Date: 2017-01-11
Language: eng
Belongs to series: Environmental Research Letters
ISSN: 1748-9326
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/182240
Abstract: Understanding climate risk is crucial for effective adaptation action, and a number of assessment methodologies have emerged. We argue that the dynamics of the individual components in climate risk and vulnerability assessments has received little attention. In order to highlight this, we systematically reviewed 42 sub-national climate risk and vulnerability assessments. We analysed the assessments using an analytical framework with which we evaluated (1) the conceptual approaches to vulnerability and exposure used, (2) if current or future risks were assessed, and (3) if and how changes over time (i.e. dynamics) were considered. Of the reviewed assessments, over half addressed future risks or vulnerability; and of these future-oriented studies, less than 1/3 considered both vulnerability and exposure dynamics. While the number of studies that include dynamics is growing, and while all studies included socio-economic aspects, often only biophysical dynamics was taken into account. We discuss the challenges of assessing socioeconomic and spatial dynamics, particularly the poor availability of data and methods. We suggest that future-oriented studies assessing risk dynamics would benefit from larger stakeholder involvement, discussion of the assessment purpose, the use of multiple methods, inclusion of uncertainty/sensitivity analyses and pathway approaches.
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Jurgilevich_et_al_2017.pdf 1.571Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record