Similar or different? : Researcher Community and Supervisory Support Experiences among Danish and Finnish Social Sciences and Humanities PhD Students

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/269776

Citation

Corner , S , Pyhältö , K , Peltonen , J & Bengtsen , S S E 2018 , ' Similar or different? Researcher Community and Supervisory Support Experiences among Danish and Finnish Social Sciences and Humanities PhD Students ' , Studies in Graduate and Postgraduate Education , vol. 9 , no. 2 , pp. 274-295 . https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00003

Title: Similar or different? : Researcher Community and Supervisory Support Experiences among Danish and Finnish Social Sciences and Humanities PhD Students
Author: Corner, Solveig; Pyhältö, Kirsi; Peltonen, Jouni; Bengtsen, Søren S.E.
Contributor organization: Department of Education
Swedish Language Affairs
The Centre for University Teaching and Learning (HYPE)
Date: 2018-11-15
Language: eng
Number of pages: 22
Belongs to series: Studies in Graduate and Postgraduate Education
ISSN: 2398-4686
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00003
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/269776
Abstract: Purpose - This paper aims to explore the support experiences of 381 PhD students within the humanities and social sciences from three research-intensive universities in Denmark (n = 145) and Finland (n = 236). The study investigates the cross-cultural variation in the researcher community support and supervisory support experiences, factors associated with their support experienced and the perceived support fit. Design/methodology/approach - The study used a mixed methods design, both quantitative analyses and qualitative analyses (open-ended descriptions) were used. Findings - The results showed that students in both Danish and Finnish programs emphasized researcher community support over supervisory support. The Danish students, however, reported slightly higher levels of researcher community support and experienced lower levels of friction than their Finnish counter partners. The results also indicated that the only form of support in which the students expressed more matched support than mismatched support was informational support. Practical implications - The results imply investing in a stronger integration of PhD students into the research community is beneficial for the students' progress. Building network-based and collaborative learning activities that enhance both instrumental and emotional support and a collective form of supervision could be further developed. The possibility of Phd student integration in the scholarly community is likely to lead to more efficient use of finacial and intellectual resources in academia and society more broadly. Originality/value - This study offer a unique contribution on doctoral students' academic and socialization experiences in terms of explicationg the sources of support, support forms and support fit among Danish and Finnish doctoral students. Both invariants and socio-culturally embedded aspects of support experience among the students were detected.
Subject: Supervisory support
Doctoral students
Support fit
Social support
Researcher community support
DOCTORAL STUDENTS
SOCIALIZATION
ATTRITION
PROGRAMS
PROGRESS
516 Educational sciences
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
SGPE_D_18_00003.pdf 316.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record