Aerial drone as a carrier for miniaturized air sampling systems

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/303223

Citation

Ruiz-Jimenez , J , Zanca , N , Lan , H , Jussila , M , Hartonen , K & Riekkola , M-L 2019 , ' Aerial drone as a carrier for miniaturized air sampling systems ' , Journal of Chromatography. A , vol. 1597 , pp. 202-208 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2019.04.009

Title: Aerial drone as a carrier for miniaturized air sampling systems
Author: Ruiz-Jimenez, Jose; Zanca, Nicola; Lan, Hangzhen; Jussila, Matti; Hartonen, Kari; Riekkola, Marja-Liisa
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
Date: 2019-07-19
Language: eng
Number of pages: 7
Belongs to series: Journal of Chromatography. A
ISSN: 0021-9673
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/303223
Abstract: The applicability of an aerial drone as a carrier for new passive and active miniaturized air sampling systems, including solid phase microextration Arrow (SPME Arrow) and in-tube extraction (ITEX), was studied in this research. Thermal desorption, gas chromatography and mass spectrometry were used for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) collected by the sampling systems. The direct comparison of the profiles of VOCs, simultaneously sampled in air by SPME Arrow system including four different coatings, allowed the elucidation of their adsorption selectivity. A more complex experimental design, involving 20 samples (10 flights) and non-supervised pattern recognition techniques, was needed for the clarification of the same sampling parameters in the case of five ITEX sorbent materials. In addition, ITEX sampling accessories, such as particle, water and ozone traps, were evaluated by comparing the results obtained for air samples simultaneously collected by two ITEX systems, packed with the same sorbent and furnished or not with sampling accessories. The effect of the aerial drone horizontal displacement (HD) on the sampling efficiency was clear in the case of SPME Arrow. The number of detected compounds and their relative peak area values (RPA) revealed a clear increase (4 and 43%, respectively) in comparison with samples collected without drone HD. However, just minor differences were observed in the case of ITEX (2 compounds and 9% of the Sigma RPA). In addition, the system was able to provide almost simultaneous passive (SPME Arrow) and active (ITEX) samplings at different altitudes (5 and 50 m), being a good tool for low cost vertical profiling studies (Sigma RPA decreased over 35% for the samples collected at 50 m). Finally, the successful simultaneous air sampling by SPME Arrow and ITEX systems in two difficult access places, such as boreal forest and wetlands, was demonstrated, resulting in 21 and 31 detected compounds in forest and wetlands by SPME Arrow, and 27 and 39 compounds by ITEX. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Subject: Aerial drone
Miniaturized air sampling systems
SPME Arrow
ITEX
Sampler
Sampling accessories
Air sampling
116 Chemical sciences
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S0021967319303632_main.pdf 567.2Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record