A Cold War for the twenty-first century : Homosexualism vs. Heterosexualism

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/304427

Citation

Kondakov , A & Essig , L 2019 , A Cold War for the twenty-first century : Homosexualism vs. Heterosexualism . in R Mole (ed.) , Soviet and Post-Soviet Sexualities . Routledge Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe Series , Routledge , New York , pp. 79-102 .

Title: A Cold War for the twenty-first century : Homosexualism vs. Heterosexualism
Author: Kondakov, Alexander; Essig, Laurie
Other contributor: University of Helsinki, Helsinki Inequality Initiative (INEQ)
Mole, Richard


Publisher: Routledge
Date: 2019-02
Language: eng
Number of pages: 24
Belongs to series: Soviet and Post-Soviet Sexualities
Belongs to series: Routledge Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe Series
ISBN: 978-1-138-65470-9
978-1-315-62307-8
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/304427
Abstract: Tension between Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin has led some pundits to announce a new Cold War. Unlike the twentieth-century Cold War, however, the new one is not so much economic as it is sexual. Rather than Capitalism vs. Communism, we see two ideological camps forming around issues of sexual citizenship and national belonging. In the US, a narrative of legal progress for LGBT citizens is used to mark the US and its allies as progressive while Russia uses its protection of ‘traditional sexual relationships’ to mark itself as an alternative to Western values. The moral regimes of what we call Homosexualism and Heterosexualism circulate in both Russia and the US as well as across the globe. That is because this new Cold War is taking place in a time when ideologies transcend the formal boundaries of nation-states. Like the old Cold War, the New Sexual Cold War results in a battle between the #x2018;good’ us and the ‘bad’ them but both ‘we’ and ‘they’ are everywhere. In this chapter, we argue that the newly revived Cold War rhetoric has deep roots in notions of Western/American exceptionalism as well as Russian spiritual superiority. Russian claims to spiritual superiority redefine homophobia as ‘traditional’ and as a victory against ‘Western Imperialism’ even though much of the rhetoric of ‘traditional sexual values’ was invented by American conservatives. Perhaps more importantly, the New Sexual Cold War rhetoric disguises how contemporary LGBT rights movements in the West and anti-gay movements in Russia are both highly contradictory spaces that are neither safe nor settled. In this chapter, we place fights over sexual citizenship and national belonging at the centre of US/Russian relations during the Obama years.
Subject: 5141 Sociology
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Essig_and_Kondakov_2019_Homosexualism.pdf 2.803Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record