(Dis) integrated valuation - Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/311971

Citation

Barton , D N , Kelemen , E , Dick , J , Martín-López , B , Gomez-Baggethun , E , Jacobs , S , Hendriks , C M A , Termansen , M , Garcia-Llorente , M , Primmer , E , Dunford , R , Harrison , P , Turkelboom , F , Saarikoski , H , van Dijk , J , Rusch , G M , Palomo , I , Yli-Pelkonen , V J , Carvalho , L , Baro , F , Langemeyer , J , Tjalling van der Wal , J , Mederly , P , Priess , J , Luque , S , Berry , P , Santos , R , Odee , D , Martinez Pastur , G , Garcia Blanco , G , Saarela , S-R , Silaghi , D , Pataki , G , Masi , F , Vadineanu , A , Mukhopadhyay , R & Lapola , D 2018 , ' (Dis) integrated valuation - Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support ' , Ecosystem Services , vol. 29 , pp. 529-541 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.021

Title: (Dis) integrated valuation - Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support
Author: Barton, David Nicholas; Kelemen, Eszter; Dick, Jan; Martín-López, Berta; Gomez-Baggethun, Erik; Jacobs, Sander; Hendriks, C.M.A.; Termansen, Mette; Garcia-Llorente, M.; Primmer, Eeva; Dunford, Rob; Harrison, Paula; Turkelboom, Francis; Saarikoski, Heli; van Dijk, J.; Rusch, Graciela M.; Palomo, Ignacio; Yli-Pelkonen, Vesa Johannes; Carvalho, Laurence; Baro, Francesc; Langemeyer, Johannes; Tjalling van der Wal, Jan; Mederly, Peter; Priess, Joerg; Luque, Sandra; Berry, Pam; Santos, Rui; Odee, David; Martinez Pastur, Guillermo; Garcia Blanco, Gemma; Saarela, Sanna-Riikka; Silaghi, Diana; Pataki, György; Masi, Fabio; Vadineanu, Angheluta; Mukhopadhyay, Raktima; Lapola, David
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Environmental Sciences
Date: 2018-02-21
Language: eng
Number of pages: 13
Belongs to series: Ecosystem Services
ISSN: 2212-0416
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/311971
Abstract: The operational challenges of integrated ecosystem service (ES) appraisals are determined by study purpose, system complexity and uncertainty, decision-makers' requirements for reliability and accuracy of methods, and approaches to stakeholder-science interaction in different decision contexts. To explore these factors we defined an information gap hypothesis, based on a theory of cumulative uncertainty in ES appraisals. When decision context requirements for accuracy and reliability increase, and the expected uncertainty of the ES appraisal methods also increases, the likelihood of methods being used is expected to drop, creating a potential information gap in governance. In order to test this information gap hypothesis, we evaluate 26 case studies and 80 ecosystem services appraisals in a large integrated EU research project. We find some support for a decreasing likelihood of ES appraisal methods coinciding with increasing accuracy and reliability requirements of the decision-support context, and with increasing uncertainty. We do not find that information costs are the explanation for this information gap, but rather that the research project interacted mostly with stakeholders outside the most decision-relevant contexts. The paper discusses how alternative definitions of integrated valuation can lead to different interpretations of decision-support information, and different governance approaches to dealing with uncertainty. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
ecosystem services
integrated valuation
ecosystem service appraisal
ecosystem service governance
information costs
uncertainty
valuation
ecosystem services cascade
economic valuation
decisions
cascade
management
framework
context
tool
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Barton_et_al_2018_ACCEPTED_FINAL_DRAFT.pdf 1.404Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record