Turning Ideas into Proposals : A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/317929

Citation

Ertiö , T-P , Tuominen , P & Rask , M 2019 , Turning Ideas into Proposals : A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki . in P Panagiotopoulos (ed.) , Electronic Participation : ePart 2019 . Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol. 11686 , Springer , Cham , pp. 15-25 , 11th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference , Italy , 02/09/2019 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27397-2_2

Title: Turning Ideas into Proposals : A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki
Author: Ertiö, Titiana-Petra; Tuominen, Pekka; Rask, Mikko
Other contributor: University of Helsinki, Centre for Consumer Society Research
University of Helsinki, Helsinki Institute of Urban and Regional Studies (Urbaria)
University of Helsinki, Centre for Consumer Society Research
Panagiotopoulos, P.


Publisher: Springer
Date: 2019-07-26
Language: eng
Number of pages: 11
Belongs to series: Electronic Participation ePart 2019
Belongs to series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
ISBN: 978-3-030-27396-5
978-3-030-27397-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27397-2_2
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/317929
Abstract: Balancing between online-offline stages of participatory procedures is a delicate art that may support or hinder the success of participatory democracy. Participatory budgeting (PB), in particular, is generally rooted in online platforms, but as our case study on the City of Helsinki PB trial suggests, face-to-face events are necessary to engage targeted and often less resourceful actors in the process. Based on a longer-term participant observation, covering the PB process from its early to ideation phase to the current stage of proposal development for the final vote, we argue that the process has thus far been successful in blending online-offline components, largely supported by the active support of borough liaisons who have served as navigators between the different stages. From the point of view of co-creation, different stages of the PB process (ideation, co-creation) call for different strategies of online-offline participation. Effective mobilization of marginalized actors and interactions between public servants and citizens seem to benefit from face-to-face processes, while city-wide voting and discussion can effectively occur in the online platform.
Subject: 511 Economics
517 Political science
113 Computer and information sciences
Rights:
Full text embargoed until: 2020-07-26


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

Embargo on files ends: 2020-07-26

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record