Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328280

Citation

Ojanen , M , Brockhaus , M , Korhonen-Kurki , K & Petrokofsky , G 2021 , ' Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives ' , Environmental Science & Policy , vol. 118 , pp. 10-17 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.002

Title: Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives
Author: Ojanen, Maria; Brockhaus, Maria; Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa; Petrokofsky, Gillian
Other contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences
University of Helsinki, International Forest Policy
University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences



Date: 2021-04
Language: eng
Number of pages: 8
Belongs to series: Environmental Science & Policy
ISSN: 1462-9011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.002
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328280
Abstract: There is growing interest – and need – among researchers and research organizations to contribute societally relevant work as well as to demonstrate the policy impact of their research. Diverse science-policy interfaces (SPIs) aim for scientifically informed policymaking by connecting scientists with policymakers. Effective SPIs need to be grounded in credibility, relevance and legitimacy; at the same time, however, they become part of the complex, politicised web of public policymaking. In this article we examine how forest researchers who participate in diverse SPIs in the context of the Global South navigate this complexity. We apply the concepts of credibility, relevance and legitimacy to explore the tensions researchers experience, as well as the strategies that researchers apply when responding to them. The research is based on in-depth interviews with 23 forest researchers and highlights (i) the tensions related to ensuring both policy and political relevance particularly in the context of research led SPIs; and (ii) tensions arising from the need to maintain credibility in the face of contestation and pressure to omit research critical of existing policies and practice and also the legitimacy of ‘experts’ operating within the SPI. Ensuring SPI effectiveness (research impact) also emerged as an additional source of tension. While multiple response strategies were identified, including knowledge co-production and strategic engagement with key policy actors, some of the tensions led to compromises, which we discuss. We conclude by highlighting the need to understand power relations in terms of both planning but also evaluating effective SPIs.
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
Forest policy
Policy learning
Power
Science-policy interface
ENVIRONMENTAL-RESEARCH
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
PUBLIC-POLICY
CREDIBILITY
CHALLENGES
LEGITIMACY
RELEVANCE
CONSERVATION
SCIENTISTS
LESSONS
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S1462901121000083_main.pdf 495.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record